Since the entry of US-sanctioned businessman, Azruddin Mohamed into the political race, key stakeholders have expressed concern about what it could mean for the support base of longstanding parties such as the People’s National Congress Reform (PNCR) and the Alliance For Change (AFC). For Opposition Parliamentarian, Jermaine Figueira, he posits that Mohamed’s sheer wealth, his family’s philanthropy, and even his controversial history, have gained some degree of popularity with some sections of the electorate. Figueira cautioned however that popularity does not always translate to votes on election day.
While it is well known that Mohamed is facing tax evasion charges in the local courts and international sanctions, Figueira said this is not the same as being found guilty of a crime. That being said, Figueira said he believes Mohamed’s entry into the political arena reflects a new and shifting democratic landscape, where financial capital is increasingly becoming a platform for political visibility.
“It is important to note that while every citizen has the constitutional right to participate in politics, the legitimacy of one’s candidacy is ultimately judged not only by the electorate, but also by their ethical standing,” said the politician.
He added, “The charges and sanctions brought against Mr. Mohamed by the U.S. government do cast a long shadow over his bid and have invited much scrutiny and fear for some who may be willing to support his bid. But he is certainly not being denied his constitutional right to participate in the political process.”
As to whether he is a threat to the longstanding opposition parties, Figueira said any candidate with access to Mohamed’s financial resources and the media attention he receives must be taken with a degree of seriousness. He noted however that political legitimacy is not built solely on wealth and popularity. “It is built on trust, vision, and a demonstrable record of service to the people, which the longstanding political parties, especially the PNCR and the PPP/C, enjoy.”
Figueria acknowledged that Mohamed’s continued philanthropy, spanning decades, and starting with his father, adds to a degree of service. Be that as it may, the Lindener said the big question is whether Mohamed has enough time, a trusted team known to the electorate, and moreover, a well articulated and achievable plan that could win the confidence of an “intelligent and somewhat tribal or clannish electorate.”
Time, he said, will provide a more lucid and confirmed answer to this matter.
